CIV PRO-AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT
The legislation aims to streamline the litigation process in cases where professionals in construction and design are accused of malpractice. By requiring an affidavit of merit, which provides expert opinion on the conduct of the defendant, the bill seeks to ensure that only cases with valid claims proceed in court. This standard is intended to prevent frivolous lawsuits and reduce the burden of litigation on professionals who may otherwise face baseless allegations. This amendment may ultimately alter the litigation landscape within Illinois, especially in construction and engineering disputes.
SB1615 introduces amendments to the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, specifically focusing on malpractice or negligence cases involving architects, engineers, and surveyors. The key provision allows a defendant in such actions to request an affidavit of merit within a specified timeframe after being served with the complaint. This affidavit, which the plaintiff must file within 56 days of the request, must indicate that the affiant has reviewed the relevant records and believes that the defendant deviated from the required standard of care, resulting in damage or injury to the plaintiff.
Overall, SB1615 represents a significant change in how malpractice claims are approached in Illinois, seeking to balance the interests of professionals with those of individuals seeking accountability. As the bill progresses, its implications will likely provoke further debate concerning professional liability and the balance between protecting practitioners and ensuring access to justice for injured parties.
While proponents argue that SB1615 will protect licensed professionals from unsubstantiated claims, critics have expressed concerns about the potential challenges of accessing expert opinions in a timely manner, which could negatively impact legitimate claims. Additionally, the requirement for an affidavit poses a barrier to plaintiffs who may face difficulties in obtaining the necessary expert evaluations. This has raised discussions among legal circles regarding access to justice for those seeking redress for legitimate grievances against architects, engineers, or surveyors.