Us Congress Senate Bill SJR10

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

Impact

If passed, SJR10 would effectively nullify the mentioned rule, leading to significant implications for the provision of reproductive health services offered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. It represents an attempt to reassert congressional control over agency regulations that impact veterans' health services. The resolution signals a prioritization of certain political stances regarding reproductive health, reflecting broader national debates on these issues within the legislative context.

Summary

SJR10 is a joint resolution that aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs concerning 'Reproductive Health Services'. The bill specifically targets a regulation published on September 9, 2022, aimed at enhancing reproductive health services for veterans. By introducing this resolution, the sponsor seeks to invalidate the regulatory framework that was set in place by the Department of Veterans Affairs, asserting that the rule may conflict with certain congressional mandates or political objectives.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SJR10 appears to be deeply divided. Proponents of the resolution argue that disapproving the rule is necessary to maintain oversight and ensure that the focus remains on issues considered paramount by certain ideological factions, notably those that might oppose expanded reproductive health services. Conversely, opponents feel that the resolution undermines beneficial services for veterans, reflecting a push against legislative measures that support comprehensive healthcare programs for this demographic.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SJR10 include debates on the appropriateness of congressional disapproval of agency rules and the impact of such actions on the welfare of veterans. Discussions highlight concerns that invalidating the rule could restrict access to essential health services for veterans, raising questions about the appropriate balance between congressional authority and the operational independence of federal agencies tasked with veterans' care.