Us Congress Senate Bill SB374

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/9/23
• Refer: 2/9/23

Caption

Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act

Impact

The proposed legislation will amend the Immigration and Nationality Act by adding new provisions that criminalize the act of illicit spotting, which refers to the transmission of location or operational details of federal, state, or local law enforcement to facilitate criminal behavior associated with immigration and border controls. Additionally, the bill will impose enhanced penalties for the destruction of border control infrastructure, thereby reinforcing the necessity of maintaining robust border security mechanisms. This legislative effort aims to bolster the government's ability to combat the complications presented by transnational crime organizations.

Summary

SB374, titled the Transnational Criminal Organization Illicit Spotter Prevention and Elimination Act, seeks to enhance penalties for actions that intentionally hinder immigration, border, and customs controls. This bill introduces significant legal provisions to address the growing concerns surrounding transnational crime and the activities of criminal organizations that exploit vulnerabilities in US border security. Key elements of the bill include severe penalties for individuals who provide information on law enforcement activities intended to support illegal immigration and smuggling operations, including the potential for up to 10 years in prison for such activities.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention regarding SB374 is its implications for individual rights and law enforcement practices. Opponents of the bill might argue that the increased penalties and potential for heavy fines and incarceration could discourage legitimate reporting and communication with law enforcement entities. Also, the definition of what constitutes unlawful hindering may be seen as too broad, potentially leading to the criminalization of behaviors that are not intended to impede legal processes. As discussions progress, stakeholders will likely scrutinize the balance between enhancing security and safeguarding civil liberties.