Us Congress House Bill HB2747

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/21/23

Caption

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Act

Impact

The legislation introduces a competitive grant program, with an authorization of $200 million annually for the years 2024 to 2028, aimed at supporting projects for the production, transport, blending, or storage of sustainable aviation fuel. By promoting technological advancements and greater production capabilities within the U.S., the bill seeks to stimulate job creation and enhance environmental sustainability in the aviation sector. It also empowers the Secretary of Transportation to consider various public benefits and emissions impacts before awarding grants, thereby fostering a proactive approach to energy management in aviation.

Summary

House Bill 2747, known as the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Act, aims to bolster the production and usage of sustainable aviation fuels in the United States. This bill establishes a national goal of achieving a 35% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from domestic and international aviation flights by 2035, and ultimately aims for net-zero emissions by 2050. It emphasizes the need for sustainable aviation fuels, which are defined as liquid fuels derived from specific feedstocks and certified to produce at least a 50% reduction in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional jet fuels.

Contention

Notably, the bill has been subject to debate regarding its implementation and potential economic implications. Some stakeholders express concerns over the feasibility of achieving the ambitious emissions reduction targets and the potential cost implications for the aviation industry. Critics worry that the transition to sustainable aviation fuels, while necessary, could prioritize rapid adoption over practical considerations like fuel affordability and availability, particularly in rural areas or for smaller airlines. Balancing environmental aspirations with economic realities remains a significant point of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 2747.