Us Congress Senate Bill SJR83

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/24
• Refer: 5/15/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to "Definition of 'Engaged in the Business' as a Dealer in Firearms".

Impact

If enacted, SJR83 would effectively nullify the ATF's rule concerning firearm dealer definitions. Proponents of the resolution believe that the rule could unfairly classify individuals who sell firearms occasionally as dealers, thereby subjecting them to regulatory burdens meant for full-time dealers. This could have implications not just for individual firearm sellers but also for the broader gun industry and its regulatory landscape. The resolution aims to maintain a clearer distinction between casual sellers and dealers to promote a more favorable environment for firearm ownership and commerce.

Summary

SJR83 is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate aimed at disapproving a rule set by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) that defines what it means to be ‘engaged in the business’ as a dealer in firearms. This resolution reflects the opposition among certain lawmakers to the regulatory framework established by the ATF which they argue could impose unnecessary restrictions on lawful firearm dealers and individuals. The resolution seeks to negate the rule which was published in the Federal Register on April 19, 2024.

Contention

The discussion surrounding SJR83 has highlighted significant contention between lawmakers advocating for gun rights and those concerned about gun control. Supporters of the resolution view it as a necessary measure to protect Second Amendment rights and to prevent overreach by federal agencies, touting it as a safeguard for small business owners in the firearm market. Conversely, critics warn that disapproving the ATF’s rule could lead to increased difficulties in tracking firearms transactions, potentially exacerbating issues related to gun violence and illegal firearm sales. This debate illustrates the ongoing tensions between regulatory authorities and firearm advocacy groups.