Us Congress Senate Bill SJR88

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/16/24
• Refer: 5/16/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review".

Impact

The disapproval of the EPA's regulation via SJR88 signifies a potential shift in how emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants are managed at the federal level. Should this resolution pass, it would impact existing provisions related to air quality standards and could potentially lead to less stringent regulations for hazardous emissions from these types of energy plants. This change could facilitate increased operational flexibility for these facilities at the potential expense of environmental health standards.

Summary

SJR88 is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate that aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule relates to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, specifically for coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units. The focus of this resolution is on disapproving the regulation that assesses the residual risk and technology review associated with emissions from these power plants. By disapproving this rule, Congress seeks to negate its effectiveness and impose a different regulatory approach to emissions from these plants.

Contention

The introduction of SJR88 is notable due to the contentious nature of environmental regulation and the balancing act between economic interests and environmental protections. Supporters of the resolution argue that reducing regulatory burdens on coal and oil-fired power plants could boost energy production and economic growth, particularly in regions reliant on these power sources. Conversely, opponents, including environmental advocacy groups and some legislators, express concerns that this resolution undermines crucial protections against hazardous emissions that could adversely affect public health and the environment.