Us Congress Senate Bill SJR100

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/20/24
• Refer: 6/20/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "New Source Performance Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry."

Impact

If enacted, SJR100 would nullify the specific EPA rule that establishes performance standards and emission limits for various hazardous air pollutants associated with chemical manufacturing. This could have significant implications for both public health and industry practices. The disapproval of these regulations suggests a legislative intent to provide more operational freedom to businesses, enabling them to circumvent what some perceive as excessive regulatory burdens. However, such actions could also mean reduced environmental protections against toxic emissions.

Summary

SJR100 is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate of the United States aimed at disapproving a particular rule put forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains to 'New Source Performance Standards' for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants related to this industry and Group I & II Polymers and Resins Industry. The sponsors of the bill believe that the EPA's regulations may be overly restrictive, potentially hindering the operational capabilities of companies within these sectors.

Contention

The resolution presents a clear divide between industry advocates and environmental groups. Proponents argue that disapproving the EPA's standards is essential for economic growth and would allow companies more flexibility in their operational procedures. Conversely, critics of SJR100 contend that overturning these standards could lead to increased pollution and health risks for surrounding communities, representing a regression in environmental governance. This contention points to a larger battle in government between corporate interests and environmental stewardship.