Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.
Impact
If ratified, HJR193 would significantly alter the legal landscape by making it clear that public officials, including the President, are not above the law. This reinforces the principle that no individual is immune from prosecution regardless of their position in government, addressing concerns over potential abuses of power. The amendment would empower law enforcement to pursue cases against federal officials more vigorously, thereby increasing the prospect of accountability for criminal actions associated with their official responsibilities.
Summary
HJR193 is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that aims to eliminate immunity from criminal prosecution for federal officers, including the President and Vice President, in connection with any violations of federal or state laws. The amendment specifically stipulates that officials cannot invoke their constitutional authority or official duties as a defense against criminal charges. Additionally, it bars the President from granting a pardon to himself or herself for any offenses against the United States, promoting the accountability of high-ranking officials within the government.
Contention
There are notable points of contention surrounding HJR193. Supporters argue that it is essential for maintaining the rule of law and preventing corruption at the highest levels of government. They believe that eliminating immunity would deter misconduct by government officials. However, opponents might raise concerns about the implications for executive power and the potential for political motivations behind prosecutions. Critics may argue that limiting presidential pardons could lead to undue political rivalry, undermining the notion of a balanced government.
Additional_notes
Ultimately, the successful passage of HJR193 would require ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. The discussion and debates surrounding this resolution are expected to be extensive, as they touch upon foundational principles of governance, accountability, and the balance of power within the federal system.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment limiting the pardon power of the President.The amendment prohibits the President from granting a pardon or reprieve to himself or herself, to relatives or members of the administration, to paid campaign employees, to a person or entity for an offense motivated by an interest of any of those people, or to a person or entity for an offense directed by or coordinated with the President.The amendment also invalidates pardons issued for a corrupt purpose.
Recognizing that members and affiliates of Tren de Aragua are alien enemies perpetrating an invasion of the United States and affirming that the President is exercising his constitutional authority to repel that invasion.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.