Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.
Impact
If enacted, HJR108 would significantly alter the legal landscape regarding governmental accountability and criminal prosecution. Currently, certain protections exist that shield government officials from prosecution under specific circumstances related to their official duties. The proposed amendment would dismantle these protections, thus enabling legal actions against officials if they commit crimes, thus aiming to restore public trust in government operations. This could serve as a deterrent against potential abuses of power by creating a clear legal avenue for accountability.
Summary
HJR108 is a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States that seeks to remove any immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken by government officials, including the President and Vice President. The resolution specifically states that officials cannot claim immunity if their actions, executed within their official duties, violate federal or state laws. Furthermore, this amendment seeks to prohibit the President from granting a pardon to themselves or herself, reinforcing the accountability of the highest office in the executive branch.
Contention
HJR108 may generate considerable debate, as opinions regarding government immunity and accountability vary widely. Supporters of the resolution argue that it is necessary to ensure that no one, not even the President, is above the law. They assert that this amendment would fortify the rule of law and ensure that government officials are held to the same standards as ordinary citizens. Conversely, opponents might contend that removing immunity could create an environment in which politically motivated prosecutions are more likely, potentially undermining the ability of officials to perform their duties without fear of retribution.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish the electoral college and to provide for the direct election of the President and Vice President of the United States.
Expressing the sense of Congress that the article of amendment commonly known as the "Equal Rights Amendment" has been validly ratified and is enforceable as the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the Archivist of the United States must certify and publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the Twenty-Eighth Amendment without delay.
Providing the sense of the House of Representatives that the attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump was an abhorrent act of cowardice that must be universally condemned and that the only appropriate place for the Nation to settle political disputes is at the ballot box on election day.