Us Congress Senate Bill SR825

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/18/24
• Refer: 9/18/24

Caption

A resolution recognizing the significance of equal pay and the pay disparity between disabled women and both disabled and nondisabled men.

Impact

The resolution has implications for federal and state employment laws, reinforcing the necessity of equal pay for disabled individuals. By highlighting the wage gap and calling for reform, the bill serves as a commitment from the Senate to advocate for fair wages and to dismantle the systemic barriers hindering equal employment opportunities for disabled women. It stresses the importance of addressing discrimination and other challenges faced by this demographic, which will necessitate evaluations of policies that disproportionately affect them in the labor market. Any legislative changes inspired by the resolution may require modifications to existing labor laws to promote greater equity.

Summary

SR825 is a resolution introduced in the Senate that acknowledges the persistent wage disparity affecting disabled women compared to both disabled and nondisabled men. It references statistics indicating that disabled women earn, on average, only 50 cents for every dollar earned by nondisabled men. The resolution underlines the urgency of recognizing and addressing these wage gaps, particularly as they relate to race and gender, which compounds the inequities faced by disabled women, especially those of color. High unemployment rates and underpayment of disabled individuals further emphasize the need for legislative action in this area.

Contention

Contrasting views on SR825 may arise from differing opinions on how best to address wage disparities. Advocates argue for the necessity of recognizing and alleviating these inequalities, while critics may suggest that the resolution does not provide specific remedies or actions for change. Further discussions might highlight the need for effective data collection on employment practices affecting disabled women and LGBTQI+ disabled individuals to better understand the scope of these issues. Debates may center around legislative solutions versus market-driven approaches to promote equity in employment practices.