Us Congress House Bill HJR214

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/18/24
• Refer: 10/18/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Migratory Bird Hunting; Final 2024-25 Frameworks for Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations".

Impact

The adoption of HJR214 would result in the nullification of the existing migratory bird hunting regulations, thus impacting how hunting seasons and frameworks are established for the 2024-25 period. This resolution underscores a significant intersection of wildlife management and federal authority, potentially shifting the balance of regulatory power back to Congress regarding hunting and wildlife laws. If enacted, it will effectively void the rules that dictate the hunting practices for migratory species, which are essential for many states' economic and recreational activities involving hunting.

Summary

HJR214 is a joint resolution introduced in the House of Representatives, aimed at disapproving a specific rule established by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service concerning the regulatory frameworks for migratory bird hunting for the 2024-25 season. The resolution formally rejects the rule published in the Federal Register and seeks to remove any legal enforceability the rule may have. This congressional measure illustrates the legislative checks on federal regulations impacting hunting practices, particularly those relating to migratory birds.

Contention

The resolution sparked debates about the appropriateness of congressional disapproval of administrative rulings. Supporters argue that it maintains legislative oversight and protects hunting interests, while critics may contend that it undermines the expertise of wildlife management professionals. The controversy lies in whether specific regulations should be left to the discretion of federal agencies or if Congress should intervene in environmental and hunting policies.

Notable points

This bill highlights the tension between environmental management and hunting rights, raising questions about the effectiveness of federal regulations and the role congressional oversight plays in wildlife conservation practices. The decision to disapprove such regulations reflects broader societal values concerning natural resource management, particularly in how hunting practices are sustained and regulated under federal law.