Mississippi House Bill HC18

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22
• Failed: 4/5/22

Caption

Day of Tears in Mississippi; recognize January 22, 2022, as.

Impact

The passage of HC18 is predominantly symbolic but highlights Mississippi's stance on the issue of abortion. By officially recognizing this date and calling for citizens to lower their flags to half-staff, the resolution seeks to promote a public mourning period, elevating the discussion around abortion rights. While the resolution does not enforce any legal change, it signals to constituents and lawmakers alike the state's profile in national debates surrounding reproductive rights. This could influence public sentiment and further legislative efforts regarding abortion within the state.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 18 (HC18) is a legislative initiative recognizing January 22, 2022, as 'The Day of Tears' in the state of Mississippi. This resolution acknowledges the historic Supreme Court decision from January 22, 1973, which established abortion as a constitutional right. The bill articulates a somber reflection on the impact of this ruling, noting that over 61 million unborn children have lost their lives since the ruling took effect. It serves as a formal acknowledgment of the ramifications of abortion on society and is intended to memorialize those who have lost their lives as a result of this legal decision.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention surrounding HC18 may stem from differing views on abortion rights and the implications of such memorial recognition. Supporters of the resolution may argue that it is necessary for reflecting on the loss of unborn lives, promoting awareness on the emotional and moral aspects tied to the abortion debate. Conversely, opponents may view this recognition as an unnecessary politicization of a personal and sensitive issue, arguing that it could undermine women’s rights to make choices about their own bodies. This dichotomy encapsulates the heated nationwide discourse on abortion, where similar measures can provoke strong opposing viewpoints.