Mississippi Senate Bill SB2525

Mississippi 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/22
• Refer: 1/17/22
• Engrossed: 2/8/22
• Refer: 2/24/22
• Enrolled: 4/4/22
• Passed: 4/18/22

Caption

MS Department of Archives and History property; authorize retention of buffer and access corridor on Champion Hill property.

Impact

The legislation facilitates a clear demarcation of land ownership which is essential for the preservation and management of historical properties. By establishing this buffer, the state can enhance the operational integrity of the national park while safeguarding the historical significance of the Champion Hill Battlefield. This move is aligned with broader efforts in Mississippi to manage and preserve its historical sites, thereby potentially increasing tourism and educational opportunities associated with the park.

Summary

Senate Bill 2525 is designed to amend Chapter 393 of the Laws of 2014 to grant the Mississippi Department of Archives and History the authority to retain a 200-foot buffer zone on the north side of the Champion Hill Historical Property. This area lies between the existing railroad right-of-way and the property managed by the National Park Service, specifically the Vicksburg National Military Park. The bill also outlines the process for the legal description of this buffer zone as well as an access corridor that will be essential for future park operations and maintenance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2525 appears to be largely positive, with support from various stakeholders in the community who see the value in preserving historical sites. The bill represents a cooperative effort between state government and federal entities, which could foster a spirit of partnership in heritage conservation. Opposition is minimal, suggesting broad bipartisan support for the initiative, especially among those committed to historical preservation.

Contention

While there have been no notable points of contention highlighted in the discussions surrounding SB2525, as with many land use proposals, some community members may express concerns over potential restrictions on land use or future developments in the area. However, the primary focus remains on the necessity of preserving historical land, with consensus emerging on the importance of such measures for educational and heritage purposes.