Mississippi Senate Bill SB2309

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Engrossed: 2/2/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Enrolled: 3/8/23
• Passed: 3/14/23

Caption

MDAH property; authorize DFA to clarify donation if certain lands in Claiborne County to U.S. Park Service.

Impact

The successful passage of SB2309 would amend Chapter 393, Laws of 2014 and subsequent amendments, providing clarity in the legal framework governing the donation of historic properties. The act establishes that the state retains mineral rights in the donated properties, ensuring that while the land ownership shifts to the federal government for preservation purposes, the state still maintains some level of control over its resources. This move is intended to aid in the operational management of the park and expand the protected historical landscape.

Summary

Senate Bill 2309 authorizes the Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration to donate certain real property known as the 'Old Magnolia Church Site' located in Claiborne County to the National Park Service. This transfer is aimed at facilitating a complete donation of all parcels of land that comprise a significant historical site related to the Vicksburg National Military Park. The bill amends prior legislation to streamline this process and clarify the terms under which the donation will occur.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely positive, especially among supporters of historic preservation and local heritage. By facilitating the donation of significant historical properties to the National Park Service, advocates argue it promotes the preservation of Mississippi's rich history. However, there are concerns that such donations could limit local opportunities for development or raise questions about the management of the donated properties. Overall, there seems to be a recognition of the bill's potential benefits balanced by discussions of its implications for local governance.

Contention

The primary contention arises from the implications of removing properties from local control, as the donation might restrict local government actions regarding the land post-transfer. Some local stakeholders express concerns on how the National Park Service will manage the site and the potential loss of local input in decisions affecting the community's historical sites. Nevertheless, many proponents argue that aligning these significant historical lands under a national framework for preservation is crucial for heritage conservation.