Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

Mississippi House Bill HB12

Introduced

1/3/23

Refer

1/3/23

Failed

1/31/23

Caption

Mississippi Code; modernize terminology by replacing "mentally retarded" with "intellectual disability".

Impact

If enacted, HB 12 would significantly impact Mississippi's legal framework concerning the classification and treatment of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The reform in terminology is not only a linguistic adjustment but also a shift towards a more inclusive approach in public policy and education. By aligning state laws with updated language, the bill would help foster an environment of acceptance and respect for individuals with disabilities, encouraging better integration and support within society. This alignment may also improve accessibility to services and programs designed for those with intellectual disabilities.

Summary

House Bill 12 is a legislative act aimed at amending several sections of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to modernize the terminology used in state statutes regarding individuals with intellectual disabilities. Specifically, the bill seeks to replace the outdated term "mentally retarded" with the more appropriate and contemporary term "intellectual disability". This change reflects a growing recognition of the need for language that respects the dignity and humanity of individuals with such disabilities. The bill targets multiple regulatory sections spanning various aspects of government and healthcare, indicating a comprehensive approach to language reform.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a positive step, there may be potential areas of contention regarding its implementation. Some stakeholders might express concerns about the pace of change and the need for further training and resources for educators and service providers to adjust to the new terminology. Additionally, there may be discussions on how such changes influence funding and support structures for various programs that cater to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Nevertheless, the overarching sentiment appears to be one of progress towards a more equitable treatment of individuals affected by such disabilities.