Mississippi Code; modernize terminology by replacing "mentally retarded" with "intellectual disability".
Impact
The impact of HB 315 is significant in terms of state law, as it alters the language that appears in multiple legal statutes. By modernizing terminology, the bill not only promotes inclusivity but also sets a precedent for future legislative efforts focused on respecting the dignity of individuals with disabilities. It reinforces the commitment of the Mississippi government to align legal language with current best practices and standards within disability advocacy.
Summary
House Bill 315 aims to amend several sections of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to replace outdated terminology in reference to individuals with disabilities, specifically substituting the term 'mentally retarded' with 'intellectual disability'. This change aligns with contemporary language and represents a shift toward more respectful and accurate descriptors for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill is part of a broader movement to modernize language used in state statutes to reflect evolving social attitudes towards disability.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 315 appears largely positive, with many stakeholders, including disability advocates and legislators, viewing the update of terminology as a step forward in recognizing and respecting the rights of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The bill received overwhelming support during voting, indicated by a tally of 120 yeas and no nays, reflecting a strong consensus among lawmakers in favor of this modernization.
Contention
There were minimal points of contention regarding HB 315. Some may argue about the pace of change in legislative terminology, expressing concerns over the time it takes to update laws to reflect social progress. However, the fact that the bill passed with unanimous support suggests that it was viewed as a necessary and non-controversial update to the Mississippi Code.