Mississippi Senate Bill SB2868

Mississippi 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Failed: 1/31/23

Caption

Taking; prohibit state cooperation with federal effort to ban firearms or seize property.

Impact

The passage of SB2868 would significantly affect the relationship between state and federal authorities concerning gun control and property rights. By preemptively restricting the ability of state entities to cooperate with federal firearm regulations, the bill seeks to position Mississippi as a defender of Second Amendment rights. Supporters of the bill argue that it is essential in curbing federal overreach, thereby potentially influencing similar legislative movements in other states. Critics may contend that such a law could undermine overall public safety measures and complicate law enforcement efforts by creating a divide between state and federal law.

Summary

Senate Bill 2868, known as the Mississippi Second Amendment and Property Rights Preservation Act, aims to reinforce and protect gun ownership rights and private property rights in the state of Mississippi. The bill specifically prohibits any state agency, department, or political subdivision from assisting or enabling federal laws, rules, or regulations that may attempt to restrict the ownership of semiautomatic firearms or magazines, require registration of firearms, or confiscate property without due process. This bill is set to take effect from January 1, 2024, and reflects a growing sentiment among various states regarding their right to limit federal encroachment on individual rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB2868 include concerns about the implications of state sovereignty versus federal authority. Proponents emphasize the necessity of protecting individual rights as enshrined in the Second Amendment, arguing that federal measures can often infringe upon these rights. On the other hand, opponents might argue that such a law could foster an environment where compliance with federal laws becomes optional, leading to potential risks in public safety. As discussions progress, debates around the interpretation of the Second Amendment and the role of state governments in enforcing or resisting federal laws are likely to dominate.