Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB56

Introduced
1/18/23  
Refer
1/20/23  
Introduced
1/18/23  
Report Pass
2/6/23  
Refer
1/20/23  
Report Pass
2/6/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  

Caption

Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

Impact

The legislation is poised to amend Chapter 291 of Hawaii Revised Statutes to include specific guidelines concerning audible reverse warning systems on state and county vehicles. This change could lead to a notable departure from the established practice of using single-tone alarms, which have shown to be less effective according to several studies, including those highlighting issues of desensitization among regular workers exposed to these sounds. The March 2017 report, for instance, revealed that the use of broadband sounds can reduce noise pollution and enhance auditory alertness, potentially leading to fewer workplace accidents.

Summary

SB56 aims to improve safety and reduce noise pollution in Hawaii by mandating the use of broadband audible reverse warning systems for state and county-owned vehicles purchased on or after January 1, 2026. Traditional tonal alarms, currently prevalent, emit a sound that can become overly familiar and ineffective as a warning signal. In contrast, broadband alarms utilize a range of frequencies, making them significantly more effective in alerting pedestrians and workers in the vicinity of reversing vehicles. This transition to broadband technology is seen as essential for both enhancing safety and mitigating environmental noise concerns.

Conclusion

The requirement for broadband reversing alarms marks a significant legislative effort to improve safety in construction and commercial sectors while addressing urban noise pollution. If successfully implemented, this law has the potential to set a new standard for vehicle safety and serves as a proactive measure to protect both workers and surrounding communities from avoidable accidents and disruptive sounds.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as a positive step towards workplace and urban safety, it may not come without opposition. Concerns may arise regarding the shifting costs to implement broadband alarm systems and potential technological hurdles for compliance within various sectors that rely on state or county vehicles. Furthermore, there may be questions related to the availability of broadband systems in the market, although the bill provides for exemptions from the mandate if such systems are not obtainable. Nevertheless, the bill is supported by legislative findings that underscore the importance of safety over traditional noise guidelines.

Companion Bills

HI SB56

Carry Over Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

Previously Filed As

HI SB312

Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

HI HB1479

Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

HI SB56

Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

HI SB3162

Relating To Audible Vehicle Reverse Warning Systems.

Similar Bills

CA AB2163

Rural Broadband and Emergency Infrastructure Grant Act of 2020.

CA AB2708

Office of Broadband and Digital Literacy: reports.

CA AB965

Local government: broadband permit applications.

CA AB1271

Communications: broadband internet service providers.

CA AB2905

Office of Broadband and Digital Literacy: reports.

CA AB2575

Broadband: state oversight.

CA SB717

Department of Technology: broadband communications: report.

CA AB1425

California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Public Housing Account.