California Law Revision Commission: persons with disabilities: terminology.
If enacted, AB1906 would lead to significant changes in the language used within various California code sections, primarily focusing on how the state identifies and interacts with persons with disabilities. The study will include input from a broad range of stakeholders, including advocacy groups and state departments, aiming to ensure the revised terminology is both accurate and respectful. It represents a broader movement towards inclusivity and recognition of the autonomy of individuals with disabilities, aligning state language with contemporary views and respect for human dignity.
Assembly Bill No. 1906 (AB1906), introduced by Gipson, mandates a review and revision of outdated and potentially misleading terminology in California law regarding individuals with disabilities. Specifically, it seeks to eliminate the terms 'dependent adult' and 'dependent person,' which the bill argues is misleading and demeaning, particularly as many individuals classified under these terms live independently. The California Law Revision Commission is tasked with conducting a comprehensive study to propose new terms that respect and accurately represent this demographic while maintaining their legal rights and protections.
The general sentiment surrounding AB1906 appears to be positive, especially among advocacy groups representing individuals with disabilities. Supporters view the bill as a critical step in modernizing legal language to reflect the realities faced by many individuals who may require support yet desire independence. However, there may be some contention surrounding how effectively the proposed new terminology will uphold the legal rights without altering existing protections, depending on broader legislative context.
The primary contention surrounding this bill may arise from the discussions on what the new terminology will be and how it will be implemented to ensure it truly reflects the needs and rights of persons with disabilities. Critics could argue about the necessary legal protections that must be maintained during this transition, and how stakeholders will ensure that the new terms do not diminish existing support structures. The requirement for the commission's study to identify and revise all relevant sections of state law could reveal complicated intersections of law that will need delicate handling to maintain essential legal protections.