California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1092

Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Refer
3/14/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
6/24/24  

Caption

Coastal resources: coastal development permits: appeals: report.

Impact

The bill mandates that by December 31, 2025, the California Coastal Commission must provide a report detailing various metrics related to the appeals of coastal development permits for multifamily housing. This includes statistics on the percentage of permits appealed, approved, and denied, as well as the duration of the appeals process. This initiative aims to offer transparency and accountability within the permit approval process, particularly for housing developments designated for urban infill sites.

Summary

Senate Bill 1092, introduced by Senator Blakespear, targets coastal resources by focusing on the approval process for multifamily housing developments within California's coastal zone. The bill amends the Public Resources Code to stipulate that any construction of two or more housing units must obtain a coastal development permit. It also establishes a framework for appealing local government decisions regarding these permits to the California Coastal Commission and requires reporting on the outcomes of these appeals.

Sentiment

The reaction to SB 1092 has been generally supportive among proponents who advocate for increased housing development to combat California's housing crisis. They argue that facilitating the permit process can help address the growing demand for multifamily units. However, there is also concern about potential negative impacts on coastal resources and oversight, which could arise from expedited permits that might not take local environmental considerations into account.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 1092 include the balance between promoting housing development and ensuring environmental protection along the coast. Critics argue that fast-tracking permits could lead to development decisions that inadequately consider ecological impacts. Furthermore, some local governments express concerns about losing authority over development decisions that affect their communities, particularly in sensitive coastal areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB3191

Coastal Resources and Energy Assistance Act.

CA AB1590

Major coastal resorts: coastal development permits: audits: waste.

CA SB1423

Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas facilities.

CA AB1448

Coastal resources: oil and gas development.

CA AB2160

Coastal resources: coastal development permits: fees.

CA AB1749

Coastal resources: development permits.

CA AB45

Coastal resources: coastal development permits: blue carbon demonstration projects.

CA SB741

Coastal resources: coastal development permit: exemption: Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor.

CA SB704

Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas developments: refineries: petrochemical facilities: offshore wind.

CA AB1408

Coastal resources: coastal development permits: fees.

Similar Bills

CA AB1764

Public postsecondary education: student housing: survey.

CA AB2666

Starter Home Revitalization Act of 2020.

CA AB797

Solar thermal systems.

CA AB803

Starter Home Revitalization Act of 2021.

CA AB1315

Housing: small lot subdivisions.

CA AB2863

Green building standards: bicycle parking.

CA AB682

Planning and zoning: density bonuses: shared housing buildings.

CA AB1232

Affordable housing: weatherization.