Virginia House Bill HB1777

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/10/23
• Report Pass: 2/2/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/13/23
• Engrossed: 2/23/23
• Enrolled: 3/7/23
• Chaptered: 4/12/23

Caption

Phase I Utilities; financing for certain deferred fuel costs, biennial reviews, etc.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1777 is expected to create a more structured approach to managing fuel costs for electric utilities in Virginia. This could stabilize rates by mitigating the impacts of sudden increases in fuel costs on consumers. The bill outlines specific guidelines under which utilities must operate, including the Commission's authority to ensure that the financing orders align with public interests and are not detrimental to customer welfare. Ultimately, it aims to foster a predictable financial framework for utilities while providing accountability measures for customer charges.

Summary

House Bill 1777 addresses the management of deferred fuel costs incurred by electric utilities and provides a framework for their recovery through financing orders. The bill allows electric utilities to petition the State Corporation Commission for a financing order to recover certain deferred fuel costs caused by fluctuations in fuel prices. This process is designed to alleviate the financial burden of abrupt rate increases for consumers by enabling utilities to issue deferred fuel cost bonds, while ensuring costs are disclosed transparently to customers through their electric bills.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1777 is generally supportive among legislators, particularly those who argue that it provides a necessary tool for addressing the volatility in energy costs that can adversely affect consumers. However, there are concerns from some advocacy groups about the potential risk of increased costs transferred to consumers if proper safeguards are not enforced. The bill's emphasis on transparency and regulation indicates a cautious yet optimistic approach towards energy finance reform.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions around the reliability and transparency of the financing order application process, as well as how these changes may ultimately affect customers' electric bills. Critics express concerns that even with the best intentions, the bill could lead to complex financial instruments that might obscure actual costs from consumers. Others argue that without stringent regulations, the risk of utilities over-recovering costs through deferred charges remains a significant issue.