Virginia House Bill HB1770

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/10/23
• Report Pass: 2/2/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/20/23
• Engrossed: 2/22/23
• Engrossed: 2/25/23
• Enrolled: 3/7/23
• Chaptered: 4/12/23

Caption

Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act; retail competitiveness, review proceedings, etc.

Impact

The impact of HB 1770 on state laws is significant, as it provides a structured approach for utilities to manage deferred fuel costs, enhancing the financial viability of energy provisioning. The bill mandates that the Commission respond to financing orders within a specific timeframe, promoting efficiency and predictability for utilities. Additionally, it sets parameters for how utilities can charge customers for these costs, which may alter existing billing practices and financing strategies for energy projects.

Summary

House Bill 1770, also known as the Virginia Electric Utility Regulation Act, aims to amend and reenact several sections of the Virginia Code regarding the financing of deferred fuel costs for electric utilities. The bill establishes a process by which electric utilities can petition the State Corporation Commission for a financing order to recover specific deferred fuel costs incurred. This will allow utilities to finance these costs through the issuance of deferred fuel cost bonds and makes provisions for timely actions on such petitions by the Commission.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1770 appears to lean towards support from utility companies who see it as a necessary step for financial stability and efficient cost recovery. However, there are concerns from consumer advocacy groups that the mechanisms established may lead to increased costs for consumers, particularly if deferred fuel cost charges are not carefully regulated. Effectively, this bill reflects ongoing tensions between utility needs and consumer protections in the energy market.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the inclusion of provisions for energy projects that utilize renewable resources. Critics argue that relying on deferred fuel cost financing could potentially hinder the transition to more sustainable energy sources if not balanced with investments in renewables. Additionally, the dichotomy between immediate financial relief for utilities and the longer-term implications for consumers and the environment represents a fundamental debate within the legislative discourse surrounding the bill.