Virginia 2024 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB6

Introduced

11/20/23

Refer

11/20/23

Report Pass

1/18/24

Engrossed

1/23/24

Refer

2/13/24

Report Pass

2/22/24

Engrossed

2/27/24

Engrossed

2/29/24

Enrolled

3/5/24

Chaptered

4/5/24

Passed

4/5/24

Caption

Restricted driver's license; issuance for multiple convictions of driving while intoxicated, etc.

Impact

The passage of SB6 will alter existing state laws on driver's license revocation, particularly regarding individuals convicted of driving while intoxicated. By detailing specific criteria for revocation and restoration, which include mandatory completion of alcohol-related programs and potential restrictions on license reissuance, the bill aims to enhance road safety and accountability for repeat offenders. This change conveys a stricter stance on driving under the influence, reinforcing the state's commitment to reducing alcohol-related traffic incidents.

Summary

SB6 introduces amendments to §46.2-391 of the Code of Virginia concerning the revocation and restoration of driver's licenses for individuals with multiple convictions related to driving under the influence. It stipulates that a driver's license shall be revoked for a period of three years for any individual adjudged a second offender or convicted of multiple offenses within a specified timeframe. The bill emphasizes the necessity of an alcohol safety action program for those seeking restoration of their driving privileges after conviction, ensuring that individuals affected demonstrate compliance with alcohol-related programs prior to reinstatement.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards SB6 among lawmakers appeared to be cautiously supportive, with recognition of its importance in combating repeat offenses related to driving under the influence. However, some opposition may arise from concerns regarding the potential impacts on individuals affected by the strict requirements for license restoration. Advocates of the bill assert that the provisions will improve public safety by holding repeat offenders accountable, while critics remain wary about the implications for those seeking rehabilitation and the potential obstacles they may face.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB6 stem from the balance between public safety concerns and the rights of individuals to regain their driving privileges post-conviction. Critics might argue that the requirements for installation of ignition interlock systems and completion of additional programs could disproportionately impact those with limited financial means. The debate reflects a broader societal discussion on how best to enforce regulations surrounding impaired driving while also fostering rehabilitation for offenders.