Relative to civil rights education in public elementary and secondary schools.
Impact
The introduction of HB 1632 could result in substantial changes to educational standards in the state, requiring school districts to incorporate these mandated subjects into their teaching plans. The State Board of Education is tasked with providing guidance and materials to assist local school boards in implementing this curriculum. However, the fiscal impact remains indeterminable as compliance costs are uncertain—whether for the Department of Education or the local districts tasked with developing instructional materials.
Summary
House Bill 1632 aims to enhance civil rights education in public elementary and secondary schools in New Hampshire. The bill mandates the inclusion of specific historical events, particularly focusing on the civil rights movement from 1954 to 1968, into the history curriculum. The bill proposes that students learn about significant reforms against racial inequality and the societal implications of hatred based on unchangeable characteristics like nationality, religion, and disability. Additionally, it requires the curriculum to cover other global acts of discriminatory injustice such as the Holocaust and various genocides, asserting a commitment to recognizing and combatting bigotry and injustice.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 1632 appears to be positive among its sponsors and advocates, who view the bill as a crucial step toward fostering awareness and acceptance among students regarding civil rights issues. However, there could be contention in the broader community about curriculum changes, especially from those who might perceive the expanded focus on civil rights and historical injustices as politically charged or unnecessary in public schools. The discussions are likely to reflect a mixture of support for comprehensive education and concerns over potential politicization.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the specifics of the curriculum and the implications of teaching certain historical events that could provoke differing opinions among parents and educators. The requirement for public disclosure of instructional materials might also instigate debates about educational content control. There is a risk that some groups might oppose the bill on the grounds that it injects political bias into education, while supporters argue it is essential for students to understand the historical contexts of civil rights issues.
Relative to student eligibility for education freedom accounts and the scholarship organization's costs of administering the program, extending phase-out grants for education freedom accounts, and revising the definitions of average daily membership in attendance and average daily membership in residence.
Relative to student eligibility for education freedom accounts and the scholarship organization's costs of administering the program, extending phase-out grants for education freedom accounts, and revising the definitions of average daily membership in attendance and average daily membership in residence.
Requiring certain non-public schools or education service providers that accept public funds to perform background checks on all employees and volunteers.
Requiring certain non-public schools or education service providers that accept public funds to perform background checks on all employees and volunteers.
Requiring certain non-public schools or education service providers that accept public funds to perform background checks on all employees and volunteers.