Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0022

Introduced
1/18/22  
Refer
1/24/22  
Report Pass
1/28/22  
Engrossed
2/4/22  
Refer
2/9/22  
Report Pass
2/11/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  

Caption

Open and Public Meetings Act Modifications

Impact

The enactment of HB 22 will significantly impact existing regulations related to public meetings in Utah by enforcing stricter protocols around electronic meetings. This includes mandating that all non-unanimous votes during electronic meetings be conducted via roll call. This change is anticipated to foster a more transparent voting process and clarify participation rules for members involved in remote meetings, which has become increasingly relevant in recent times.

Summary

House Bill 22, known as the Open and Public Meetings Act Modifications, introduces key changes to the procedures regarding electronic meetings held by public bodies in Utah. One of the primary modifications involves the requirement for public bodies to clearly establish how quorum is calculated for meetings conducted electronically. This aims to ensure that participation numbers are clear and standardized for virtual settings. Additionally, the bill prohibits members from voting or taking action by proxy unless the governing body adopts specific rules allowing such measures, which aims to enhance accountability and transparency during meetings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears generally positive among proponents who view these modifications as necessary advancements in public meeting protocols, particularly in the context of modernizing meetings to adapt to electronic formats. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential limitations imposed on remote participation and proxy voting, as critics could argue these rules may complicate access for members who cannot attend in person. Overall, the discussions have reflected a cautious optimism towards enhancing the openness of government proceedings.

Contention

Contention surrounding HB 22 seems primarily focused on the implications of restricting proxy voting. Some lawmakers and advocacy groups expressed concerns that the inability to vote by proxy could disadvantage those unable to attend meetings in person due to health, safety, or logistical challenges. The legislative debates highlighted the balance between maintaining integrity and ensuring accessibility in public governance, reflecting broader discussions on how to effectively manage public participation in an increasingly digital world.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HB0021

Open and Public Meetings Act Amendments

UT HB0036

Open and Public Meetings Act Amendments

UT HB0135

Open and Public Meeting Modifications

UT SJR005

Joint Rules Resolution - Electronic Meetings Modifications

UT SB0092

Project Entity Oversight Modifications

UT HB0284

Primary Elections Modifications

UT HB0069

Election Modifications

UT HB0406

Land Use, Development, and Management Act Modifications

UT HB0439

Elected Public Body Transparency Amendments

UT HB0351

Domestic Violence Modifications

Similar Bills

TX HB3309

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an electronic notary public; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1217

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an online notary public and online acknowledgment and proof of written instruments; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

NC S552

Modifications to Notary Public Act

CA AB1667

Electronic wills.

CA AB2961

Civil procedure: electronic filing and service.

CA AB2283

Civil actions: electronic service.

LA HB572

Provides for electronic notaries public and electronic notarial acts

CA SB666

Service of papers: electronic service by court.