California Assembly Bill AR116

California 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/7/24
• Passed: 8/15/24

Caption

Relative to the assassination attempt on former President Donald J. Trump.

Impact

The bill reinforces the Assembly's condemnation of violence directed at political figures, echoing sentiments shared by President Biden who called for a reduction in hostile political rhetoric. By officially denouncing the assassination attempt, HR 116 aims to highlight the broader implications of maintaining civil discourse in political matters. This resolution does not change state laws but underscores the Assembly's commitment to preserving democracy and the rule of law in the face of threats, aiming to inspire similar declarations across political lines to unify against violence.

Summary

House Resolution No. 116, introduced by Assembly Member Gallagher, addresses the assassination attempt on former President Donald J. Trump on July 13, 2024. During a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, an armed individual fired multiple shots at Trump, narrowly missing him while tragically killing a bystander, Corey Comperatore, who attempted to protect his family. This resolution serves to formally condemn the violent act, recognizing the serious nature of threats against public officials and the growing concerns regarding political violence in the United States. The bill emphasizes the need for a united front against such acts and calls for fostering political discourse that promotes peace and respect among representatives of different political views.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HR 116 may arise regarding the political climate and the implications of severe rhetoric surrounding public officials. While supporters of the resolution may argue that it is essential to establish a clear stance against all forms of political violence, opponents could contend that it does not adequately address the root causes of such violence. This discussion may encompass perspectives on how divisive political environments contribute to the escalation of threats against public figures, and whether mere condemnation is sufficient to foster lasting change.