Change provisions relating to the Board of Parole, eligibility for parole, reentry services, post-release supervision, grant programs, and prisons, adopt the Community Work Release and Reentry Centers Act, provide for performance metrics, Parole School, book donations, and reentry career planning, and transfer the Division of Parole Supervision to the Department of Correctional Services
Impact
This bill represents a significant shift in state law regarding the management and oversight of parole and reentry services. By incorporating performance metrics and enhancing support systems for parolees, LB631 aims to improve outcomes for individuals reentering society, with a focus on reducing recidivism rates. The funding and structural changes introduced by the bill are designed to facilitate a more coordinated approach to parole supervision and integration into the community, which could potentially benefit public safety and overall community health.
Summary
LB631 is a legislative bill aimed at reforming the state's parole processes and enhancing reentry services for individuals transitioning back into society. The bill outlines necessary changes to the provisions governing the Board of Parole, eligibility criteria for parole, and the expansion of reentry services, including the establishment of Community Work Release and Reentry Centers. Additionally, it lays the groundwork for the implementation of performance metrics and the development of programs focused on career planning for those reentering the community after incarceration.
Sentiment
The sentiment around LB631 appears largely positive, with supporters advocating for a more rehabilitative approach to parole and reentry services. By emphasizing the importance of community support and job readiness, proponents argue that the bill represents a progressive step towards helping individuals reintegrate into society successfully. However, some hesitation exists concerning resource allocation and the effectiveness of the introduced programs in achieving the desired outcomes.
Contention
Notable points of contention in discussions surrounding LB631 center on the adequacy of resources to support the expanded services and the potential challenges in implementing the proposed changes effectively. Critics have voiced concerns about the execution of the bill, questioning whether the state will allocate enough funding to ensure that the new programs can operate successfully and whether adequate oversight will be provided for the performance metrics established. These factors could significantly influence the bill's success in achieving its goals.
Transfer the Division of Parole Supervision to the Department of Correctional Services and change provisions relating to the release of certain prisoners
Adopt the Community Work Release and Treatment Centers Act and change provisions relating to the Board of Parole, the Department of Correctional Services, and the Office of Probation Administration
Adopt the Community Work Release and Treatment Centers Act and change provisions relating to the Board of Parole, the Department of Correctional Services, and the Office of Probation Administration
Eliminate the Division of Parole Supervision and the position of Director of Supervision and Services, transfer powers and duties to the Department of Correctional Services, and change provisions relating to correctional system overcrowding emergencies
Transfer the Office of Probation Administration to the executive branch, rename the Division of Parole Supervision as the Parole Supervision Agency, and remove such agency from the Board of Parole
Require an annual report on active cases by the Department of Correctional Services, the Office of Probation Administration, and the Division of Parole Supervision
Adopt the Second Look Act, change provisions relating to sentences and certain offenses, provide for good time for offenders serving mandatory minimum terms, provide for expanded parole eligibility and for geriatric parole, and change provisions relating to parole