Maryland Senate Bill SB375

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/22
• Refer: 1/21/22

Caption

Crimes - Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications - Exception for Imminent Danger

Impact

If passed, this bill would have implications on the existing laws surrounding the privacy of communications in Maryland. Currently, any unauthorized interception of communication is a felony, punishable by severe penalties. By allowing for exceptions in situations of imminent danger, SB375 aims to balance the right to privacy with the urgent need for self-defense. It reflects a legislative intent to provide individuals with tools to protect themselves in situations where they could be harmed.

Summary

Senate Bill 375 pertains to the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications and establishes an exception in cases where a person believes they are in imminent danger of becoming a victim of a crime. Specifically, it allows individuals to intercept communications if they have reason to believe they are at risk of violence, stalking, or violations of protective orders. This change is significant as it modifies existing Maryland law to permit such interceptions under these specific, high-stakes conditions.

Contention

Notably, SB375 could lead to substantial debates regarding privacy rights. Opponents might argue that it could open the door to abuses, where individuals might claim imminent danger to justify unauthorized interceptions. Critics may also express concern over how the terms 'imminent danger' and 'crime of violence' are defined, fearing that broad interpretations might undermine the privacy rights of individuals. Proponents, however, may argue that the change is necessary to better protect individuals who are genuinely at risk.