Michigan House Bill HB4064

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Report Pass: 4/11/23
• Engrossed: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/19/23

Caption

Education: curriculum; model program of instruction in cursive handwriting; create, and make optional for public schools. Amends 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1 - 380.1852) by adding sec. 1164c.

Impact

The proposed legislation encourages school boards to incorporate at least one of the model programs for cursive instruction into their curricula starting from the 2024-2025 academic year. By setting a deadline for the availability of these resources, the bill motivates educational institutions to adapt and enrich their teaching methodologies, fostering a return to traditional handwriting skills that proponents argue are essential for personal expression and historical literacy.

Summary

House Bill 4064 introduces reforms to the Michigan education system by amending the revised school code to include cursive handwriting instruction. The bill mandates that the Michigan Department of Education develop and make available a model curriculum for teaching cursive writing in public schools. This initiative aims to rejuvenate interest and skills in cursive writing, which has seen a decline in instructional time in recent years due to the rise of technology and typing skills in education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4064 has been largely positive among supporters who argue that cursive handwriting is an important skill that helps in cognitive development and personal identity. Advocates for the bill stress the cultural and historical significance of cursive writing, noting its role in effective communication. However, there are also criticisms regarding the necessity of such a requirement, especially in a digital age where keyboard typing is dominant. Opponents may view this as a misallocation of educational resources amidst other pressing academic needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include whether the inclusion of cursive handwriting instruction should be a mandated aspect of the curriculum, or if it should remain an optional supplement in a rapidly evolving educational landscape. Critics suggest that the focus should instead be on core subjects and digital literacy, while proponents see this as an opportunity to enrich the curriculum. The debate highlights broader themes regarding educational priorities and the balance between traditional and modern skills in teaching.