Michigan Senate Bill SB0080

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/23
• Refer: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Report Pass: 3/16/23
• Engrossed: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Report Pass: 3/22/23
• Enrolled: 3/23/23
• Chaptered: 4/19/23
• Passed: 4/19/23

Caption

Crimes: weapons; sentencing guidelines reference; update. Amends sec. 11b, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.11b). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0079'23

Impact

Should SB0080 be enacted, it would significantly revise the Chapter XVII of the state's criminal laws by enhancing penalties for offenses like counterfeiting state ID cards, misrepresenting personal information, and firearm safety violations. The changes are expected to deter criminal activities related to identity fraud and illegal firearm handling, presenting a tougher stance against repeated offenders. Additionally, the establishment of clear guidelines aims to lead to uniformity in how offenses are prosecuted and sentenced across Michigan.

Summary

Senate Bill 0080 aims to amend the existing criminal procedure laws in Michigan, particularly focusing on updating the sentencing guidelines associated with certain crimes, including the unauthorized disclosure of information from the Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN), various offenses related to state identification cards, and firearm-related violations. The bill introduces stricter penalties for repeated offenses and updates classifications for various crimes, which would align the state’s legal framework with current law enforcement needs and technological changes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB0080 seems to be largely supportive among law enforcement and legal professionals, who argue that the updates are necessary for maintaining public safety and ensuring that the law keeps pace with evolving criminal tactics. However, there is also some concern from civil liberties advocates who worry that increased penalties may lead to disproportionate impacts on certain communities, especially in cases where individuals might face harsh consequences for minor offenses.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the bill's potential to impose stricter penalties that critics argue may not take into account the nuances of individual cases. For instance, penalties for failures related to firearm storage could disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens, particularly when an accidental injury occurs. This raises concerns about fairness and the adequacy of legal protections for individuals inadvertently entangled in such circumstances.