Michigan Senate Bill SB0249

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/11/23
• Refer: 4/11/23
• Report Pass: 10/19/23
• Refer: 10/19/23
• Report Pass: 10/24/23
• Engrossed: 11/2/23
• Refer: 11/2/23
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Report Pass: 4/24/24
• Enrolled: 5/2/24
• Chaptered: 5/23/24
• Passed: 5/23/24

Caption

Health occupations: emergency medical services personnel; examinations for certain emergency medical services personnel; modify, and require certain notices from education program sponsors. Amends secs. 20904, 20912, 20950, 20952 & 20954 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.20904 et seq.).

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the licensing processes for EMS personnel, including establishing new examination requirements and maintaining standards for educational programs. It mandates that educational programs for paramedics receive appropriate accreditation to ensure that all training meets contemporary expectations for emergency medicine. By requiring a specific level of experience for instructors and setting renewal fees and conditions for maintaining licenses, SB0249 aims to enhance the quality and accountability of emergency medical services in Michigan.

Summary

Senate Bill 0249 amends the 1978 Public Health Act (PA 368) to improve the regulation and training of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. The bill updates the definitions related to emergency medical services and outlines the qualifications required for education program sponsors. It establishes the standards under which EMS personnel, including medical first responders, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics, must be trained and licensed. The intent is to ensure a more qualified workforce capable of delivering effective emergency medical care across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB0249 appears to be generally supportive among health professionals and regulatory bodies who view these changes as essential for improving public health outcomes. Supporters argue that by tightening the licensing process and enhancing training for EMS personnel, the state will be better prepared for medical emergencies. However, there are concerns among some service providers regarding the increased financial burden due to training costs and licensing fees, especially for volunteer and community-based services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased costs associated with the new licensing and training requirements. While the aim is to elevate the standards of emergency medical services, some stakeholders fear that it may create barriers for entry into the profession and disproportionately affect rural or underserved communities that rely heavily on volunteer emergency responders. The balance between maintaining high standards and ensuring accessibility to EMS professions remains a pivotal discussion point related to the bill.