Michigan Senate Bill SB1051

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/30/24
• Refer: 10/30/24

Caption

Health occupations: emergency medical services personnel; relicensure after expiration of certain licenses; expand. Amends sec. 20954 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.20954).

Impact

If enacted, SB1051 will significantly impact existing statutes regulating emergency medical services personnel in Michigan. The amendments aim to reduce financial burdens on EMS professionals, particularly those serving as volunteers. By allowing a no-fee renewal for medical first responders and a reduced fee structure for other categories of EMS personnel, the bill supports the retention of qualified professionals in a critical field. The approach reflects a growing recognition of the valuable role that volunteers play in EMS, potentially enhancing the overall public health infrastructure by ensuring that emergency services are adequately staffed.

Summary

Senate Bill 1051, titled 'Health occupations: emergency medical services personnel; relicensure after expiration of certain licenses; expand,' aims to amend section 20954 of the Public Health Code from 1978. The proposed changes seek to facilitate the process of renewing emergency medical services (EMS) personnel licenses by allowing for more flexibility and reducing fees for specific license types. The bill emphasizes the necessity for continuous education and provides mechanisms for verifying compliance with ongoing training requirements established by the department. Importantly, it stipulates that certain personnel are exempt from paying renewal fees under specific conditions, particularly for volunteers associated with life support agencies.

Contention

While SB1051 seems to gain support from various stakeholders due to its focus on reducing barriers for EMS personnel, critics may argue that the emphasis on fee reduction could lead to lesser oversight in competency verification. Concerns can arise regarding the proposed mechanisms for ensuring that all EMS personnel maintain required qualifications and engage in ongoing education. Moreover, the bill’s impact on state revenues from licensing fees may be a point of contention among legislators who prioritize funding for public health services.