Hawaii Senate Bill SB3196

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Report Pass: 2/16/24
• Report Pass: 3/1/24
• Refer: 2/16/24
• Engrossed: 3/5/24
• Refer: 3/7/24

Caption

Relating To Firearms.

Impact

If enacted, SB3196 will amend several sections of the Hawaii Revised Statutes related to the acquisition, sale, and possession of firearms. The bill introduces a prohibition against the sale or transfer of .50 caliber rifles and certain firearm attachments, unless such sales are conducted under strict conditions, such as transferring to authorized personnel—law enforcement or military. The threshold for magazine capacities will also be modified, specifically restricting detachable magazines with an over twenty-round capacity. Overall, SB3196 evidences Hawaii's continuous effort to bolster its regulations on firearms, thus reinforcing public safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 3196 addresses firearm regulations in the State of Hawaii by expanding existing prohibitions on certain categories of firearms. Specifically, the bill amends the state's assault weapons ban to include .50 caliber rifles and assault weapon attachments, reflecting the legislature's commitment to maintaining strong gun safety laws. The legislature has noted Hawaii's previous accomplishments in gun control, including its ranking for low gun deaths per capita, and aims to further enhance these provisions through SB3196.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB3196 appears to be predominantly supportive among legislators prioritizing gun safety measures, aligning with Hawaii's historical stance on firearm control. Advocates argue it is a necessary step to close gaps in existing laws and enhance public safety. However, some opposition may arise from gun rights advocates who see these measures as an infringement on individual rights and an overreach by the government, potentially arguing that such prohibitions could lead to unwarranted penalties for law-abiding citizens.

Contention

Notable points of contention could revolve around defining what constitutes an 'assault weapon' and the implications for gun owners, which might lead to legal challenges regarding the clarity and applicability of the definitions being introduced. Critics may express concern that overly strict regulations could negate individual rights and create confusion about compliance standards. The bill's enforceability will also depend on subsequent interpretations and the specific implementations of these regulations.