Wisconsin Senate Bill SJR8

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/27/23
• Refer: 1/27/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Providing for an advisory referendum on the question of requiring revocation of release if a person on parole, extended supervision, or probation is charged with a crime.

Impact

The passing of SJR8 would entail an advisory referendum, which is intended to gauge public sentiment on the revocation policy for those under supervision. If adopted, the resolution would ensure that the referendum takes place during the next spring or general election, allowing citizens to express their opinions. This move could influence future legislative considerations around parole and probation policies and how they intersect with criminal behavior post-release. Additionally, it may initiate changes in how the Department of Corrections operates concerning individuals who commit new offenses while under supervision.

Summary

SJR8 is a Senate Joint Resolution that proposes an advisory referendum regarding the revocation of release for individuals on parole, extended supervision, or probation when they are charged with a crime. This measure was introduced by Senator Jacque and co-sponsored by Representatives Wichgers, Allen, and Donovan. The resolution seeks to empower voters to weigh in on whether the Department of Corrections should be mandated to recommend revoking the release of such individuals under specific circumstances, thereby prompting a public discussion on the effectiveness of current supervision measures within the criminal justice system.

Contention

Detractors of SJR8 may argue that mandatory revocation upon any new charge could lead to increased incarceration rates and further burden an already strained criminal justice system. Supporters contend that strict measures are necessary to ensure public safety and accountability among those on parole or probation. The resolution addresses a significant question about balancing rehabilitation efforts with community protection, reflecting ongoing debates about the rights of formerly incarcerated individuals versus the need for public safety.