Ohio 2023-2024 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB226

Introduced
6/26/23  
Report Pass
1/29/24  
Engrossed
2/7/24  
Report Pass
6/25/24  
Enrolled
6/26/24  
Passed
7/24/24  

Caption

Regards customer-owned water service lines replacement costs

Impact

If enacted, the bill would significantly alter the way water-works companies manage their infrastructure and customer interactions regarding service lines. By permitting the utility companies to include the costs of replacing customer-owned water service lines in their property valuations, the bill effectively helps to mitigate the financial burdens on customers faced with the costs of such replacements. This can potentially lead to improved public health outcomes by accelerating the replacement of outdated and hazardous infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 226 aims to amend sections of the Ohio Revised Code to address the responsibilities of water-works companies in relation to customer-owned water service lines. Specifically, it allows water-works companies to replace customer-owned water service lines that are lead or otherwise harmful, either during scheduled projects or in compliance with regulatory mandates. The bill seeks to clarify the procedures for replacement and reimbursement related to these service lines, promoting the safety and health of the public by reducing the risk associated with lead exposure in drinking water.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 226 has been supportive, with various stakeholders expressing approval of the bill's intent to enhance public safety by addressing lead service lines. Public utilities, legislative members, and advocates for drinking water safety have generally backed the bill, seeing it as a proactive approach to a longstanding public health concern. However, there may still be discussions on how costs will be managed and balanced between utilities and consumers, reflecting some concerns in the operational feasibility of the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for public utilities in terms of financial accountability and customer service responsibilities. Critics or skeptics may raise alarms over the long-term costs associated with implementing new requirements and how they will affect utility rates. In particular, there is concern regarding how reimbursement processes will be structured, which could raise questions about equity for customers needing to replace their water lines and whether the bill sufficiently protects their interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OH HB260

Regards public utilities and competitive retail electric service

OH HB142

Regards natural gas company rate plans, property valuation

OH SB102

Regards public utilities, competitive electric and gas services

OH SB103

Allow alternative rate plans for certain natural gas companies

OH HB15

Amend competitive retail electric service law

OH SB2

Increase power generation; improve Ohio's electric grid

OH HB3174

Requiring municipalities take actions when potential customers apply for water and sewer service.

OH HB1184

Electrical utilities; authorize certain large customer supply and service agreements with customers have MDA approved project.

OH SB118

Regards lien limits for unpaid water, sewer, disposal services

OH HB2445

Real estate; water service; study

Similar Bills

CA AB1598

Impersonation for the purpose of a sexual relationship.

CA AB652

Property taxation: base year value: new construction.

CA AB2732

Emergency Telephone Users Surcharge Act: Next Generation 911.

NC S261

Energy Security and Affordability Act

TX HB3498

Relating to mechanic's, contractor's, or materialman's liens.

CA SB586

Flood management: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley.

OH SB103

Allow alternative rate plans for certain natural gas companies

OH HB142

Regards natural gas company rate plans, property valuation