California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB586

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Refer
5/26/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Report Pass
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
4/18/24  
Enrolled
4/18/24  
Chaptered
4/30/24  
Passed
4/30/24  

Caption

Flood management: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley.

Impact

By extending the deadline for flood protection compliance, SB 586 acknowledges the ongoing challenges faced by the region in meeting its flood management goals. The legislation not only alleviates some immediate pressures on local authorities but also provides a framework for accountability, as it stipulates that the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency and the West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency submit reports every five years detailing their progress on flood protection measures until 2038, thus ensuring ongoing oversight.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 586, introduced by Senator Eggman, focuses on flood management in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley. The bill amends existing government code sections to extend the deadline for achieving urban level flood protection for the Mossdale Tract and the City of West Sacramento until the year 2040. This change is crucial as it allows for additional time to complete necessary flood control projects aimed at safeguarding local communities from potential flooding, particularly those developments in flood hazard zones.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 586 appears to be generally positive among stakeholders who recognize the urgent need for enhanced flood management, especially given the history of flooding experiences in the area. However, there may also be concerns regarding the extended timeline, as some community members may worry that this delay could pose risks if significant flooding were to occur during that period. Overall, the bill seems to have bipartisan support focused on protecting public safety.

Contention

Despite its support, SB 586 may face contention from those worried about potential structural implications or long-term reliance on extended deadlines rather than proactive flood risk management. There is a delicate balance between ensuring adequate flood protection for current and future developments while also mitigating risks associated with flooding in vulnerable areas. As such, the bill will likely prompt discussions on the effectiveness and efficiency of California's approach to managing flood risks and liabilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB639

Zoning: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley.

CA AB838

Flood management: Mossdale Tract.

CA SB1139

Flood protection: City of Sacramento: Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

CA SB901

Flood protection: City of West Sacramento flood risk reduction project.

CA AB921

Flood protection: City of West Sacramento flood risk reduction project.

CA AB979

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: projects: sea level rise analysis report.

CA SB650

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009.

CA AB1876

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Plan: administration.

CA AB1613

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Salinity Intrusion in the Delta Act.

CA AB792

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Delta Stewardship Council.

Similar Bills

CA SB1139

Flood protection: City of Sacramento: Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.

CA SB639

Zoning: Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley.

CA SB901

Flood protection: City of West Sacramento flood risk reduction project.

CA AB1223

Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act: Sacramento Transportation Authority.

CA AB709

Sacramento Regional Transit District.

CA AB838

Flood management: Mossdale Tract.

CA AB338

State Capitol grounds.