Michigan House Bill HB4505

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/4/23
• Refer: 5/4/23
• Report Pass: 10/12/23
• Engrossed: 5/2/24
• Refer: 5/7/24

Caption

Health occupations: physical therapists; licensing process; modify to incorporate physical therapy licensing compact. Amends sec. 17801 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.17801) & adds secs. 17820a & 17820b. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4504'23

Impact

The legislation is expected to enhance the availability of physical therapy services in Michigan by allowing licensed professionals from other states to practice without the need for separate state licensing. As a result, residents may benefit from increased access to care, particularly in areas with a shortage of physical therapy providers. Additionally, the amendment potently positions Michigan within the network of states participating in the compact, promoting a more unified approach to healthcare provider regulation across the nation.

Summary

House Bill 4505 seeks to amend Michigan's Public Health Code by incorporating provisions related to the physical therapy licensure compact. This bill aims to streamline the licensing process for physical therapists and physical therapist assistants by recognizing their licensure under a multi-state compact, thereby facilitating easier mobility for practitioners across state lines. Significantly, the bill specifically defines the roles and responsibilities of physical therapists and their assistants, ensuring clarity in the regulatory framework governing the practice of physical therapy within the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 4505 appears to be positive, particularly among professional organizations representing physical therapists. Supporters argue that this bill represents an important step towards modernizing healthcare regulations, enhancing patient access to care, and reducing bureaucratic barriers that can impede the practice of qualified professionals. Notably, the voting history reflects a strong majority in favor of the bill, with minimal opposition, which suggests consensus on its benefits in the health care community.

Contention

Despite its broad support, there are concerns regarding the implications of aligning Michigan’s licensing process with the compact regulations. Skeptics caution that while the bill promotes practitioner mobility, it may also lead to challenges in ensuring consistent standards of education and practice across different states. Some critics have expressed fears that expedited licensure may compromise local oversight in favor of more generalized, compact-mandated requirements.