Wisconsin Senate Bill SB170

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Report Pass: 1/31/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Earned release for inmates upon the completion of an employment readiness training program and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, SB170 would expand the eligibility for earned release under Wisconsin's criminal statutes, potentially changing how inmates serve their sentences. Inmates will be able to petition the court for conversion of their confinement time to supervised community time upon demonstrating completion of both a substance abuse program and an employment readiness program. The Department of Corrections (DOC) is directed to establish rules for implementing these changes and to report on various metrics, including recidivism rates and program participation, improving the state's approach to monitoring the efficiency and effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts in the correctional system.

Summary

Senate Bill 170 seeks to modify the earned release program for incarcerated individuals in Wisconsin. The primary change introduced by the bill allows inmates who complete an employment readiness training program (ERTP) to be eligible for early release. Previously, this program was exclusively available to those who completed substance abuse treatment programs. The change reflects a broader approach to rehabilitation, acknowledging the importance of job readiness in reducing recidivism among offenders. This bill aims to enhance opportunities for inmates to reintegrate into society by equipping them with necessary skills for employment upon their release.

Contention

The modifications introduced by SB170 may elicit mixed reactions among lawmakers and the public. Proponents argue that expanding the earned release program to include job training not only supports rehabilitation but also benefits public safety by reducing repeat offenses. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the adequacy of resources for providing these training programs or question whether such reforms adequately hold offenders accountable. Moreover, the implementation timeline set by the legislation stipulates a one-year delay before these changes take effect, which may affect the urgency and momentum of the proposed reforms.