Wisconsin Senate Bill SB989

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/24
• Refer: 2/2/24
• Report Pass: 2/14/24
• Engrossed: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Combining the choice programs and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The legislation will have a significant impact on current and future private schools that participate in state-funded choice programs. By enforcing strict accreditation requirements, the bill aims to improve the quality of education provided to pupils. Additionally, it mandates that teachers and administrators in these schools meet specific qualification thresholds, such as obtaining teaching licenses or degrees from accredited institutions, thereby enhancing educational standards. The financial audit process for these schools will also be standardized to ensure more robust oversight and accountability, aligning the audits of SNSP and Private School Choice Programs.

Summary

Senate Bill 989 aims to amend the parameters surrounding Private School Choice Programs, specifically regarding accreditation, funding, and operational standards for private schools participating in these programs. The bill stipulates that starting from the 2025-26 school year, only accredited private schools will be allowed to participate in the Special Needs Scholarship Program (SNSP), effectively raising the bar for school eligibility. This change is accompanied by a provision for existing schools that were already part of the SNSP before the transition, allowing them to continue operating under the previous rules until they comply with the new accreditation requirements.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB989 include concerns from educators and advocates who argue that these stringent requirements may limit access to private education for students with special needs. Critics highlight that raising accreditation standards might disproportionately affect smaller, less-resourced schools that cater to specific communities. Furthermore, there are debates about whether the increased regulatory measures will indeed lead to improved educational outcomes or simply create unnecessary barriers for schools trying to participate in state-funded programs. Opponents of the bill emphasize the need to balance accountability with accessibility in educational opportunities for all students.