Prohibits the enforcement of any federal regulation by a state department or agency until the enforcement is approved by the General Assembly
Impact
If enacted, SB 956 would repeal existing provisions in state law and establish new processes for the evaluation of federal regulations. This could lead to a substantial shift in how regulations are enacted and enforced within the state. The bill mandates that all federal rules and regulations be subject to legislative review, which may delay or complicate the enforcement of important regulatory measures, affecting areas such as public safety and environmental protection. Critics argue that this could undermine essential protections while supporters believe it strengthens state rights.
Summary
Senate Bill 956, introduced by Senator Moon, seeks to reinforce state sovereignty by prohibiting the enforcement of federal regulations by state departments or agencies without prior approval from the General Assembly. The intention behind this bill is to ensure that states maintain their independent status within the federal system of governance as prescribed by the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, thus preventing federal encroachments on state authority. The bill proposes a structure for reviewing and either enforcing or repealing existing federal regulations, placing significant power in the hands of the state legislative body.
Contention
The primary points of contention surrounding SB 956 center on the balance of power between state and federal authorities. Supporters view it as a crucial tool for protecting state interests and individual freedoms, while opponents fear it could lead to the disregard of vital federal regulations that ensure public welfare and environmental protections. The establishment of a permanent committee within the General Assembly to oversee the enforcement of rules is seen as both a potential safeguard against regulatory overreach and a mechanism that could lead to legislative gridlock on timely issues.
Summary_conclusion
Overall, SB 956 is a significant piece of legislation that reflects ongoing tensions in American federalism and the dynamics of state versus federal authority. Its implications could resonate across various sectors, influencing not only how regulations are managed but also the relationship between different levels of government.
Prohibiting the enforcement of federal rules or regulations and the promulgation of state rules and regulations to carry out such enforcement without legislative approval.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.