Kansas Senate Bill SB375

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/23/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Prohibiting the use of generative artificial intelligence to create false representations of candidates in election campaign media or of state officials.

Impact

If enacted, SB375 will amend existing election laws related to 'corrupt political advertising'. It establishes that using synthetic media or altered representations without proper disclosure is considered a class C misdemeanor. The intent is to maintain the integrity of election communications and ensure transparency, compelling those who employ such technologies to transparently inform viewers about the true nature of the media they consume. By clarifying the definitions and expectations regarding political advertising, the bill seeks to enhance accountability in electoral processes.

Summary

Senate Bill 375 aims to address the challenges posed by false representations in political campaign media, particularly those generated by artificial intelligence. The bill specifically prohibits the use of generative AI technologies to create misleading or false representations of candidates or state officials in any election campaign material. This legislative action comes in response to growing concerns about the impact of synthetic media on public perception in the political arena, especially as technology continues to evolve rapidly.

Conclusion

SB375 represents a proactive step in adapting electoral laws to the implications of modern technology, particularly as the public becomes increasingly aware of the possible distortions created by AI-driven content. Its passage could set a significant precedent in how technology is regulated in political campaigning, influencing legislative frameworks in other states and at the federal level.

Contention

Notably, there may be contentious discussions surrounding the definition of 'synthetic media' and how broadly it can be interpreted. Proponents could argue that strict regulations are essential to prevent deception in political discourse, while opponents might raise concerns about potential restrictions on free speech and the ability of candidates to utilize technology in creative ways. The bill may spark debate on the balance between regulating misleading information and safeguarding the rights of candidates to communicate innovatively.