Connecticut House Bill HB06846

Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/31/25
• Report Pass: 2/28/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 3/19/25
• Refer: 4/22/25
• Report Pass: 4/25/25

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Artificial Intelligence And Other Means To Generate Deceptive Synthetic Media And Affect Elections.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6846 would amend existing state laws related to communication and election integrity. Specifically, it imposes criminal liabilities and civil consequences for individuals who knowingly distribute deceptive synthetic media during a critical time frame surrounding elections. The penalties vary based on the severity of the offense, which can include fines and imprisonment. Additionally, it allows candidates harmed by such distribution to seek legal recourse against violators, thereby strengthening protections for political individuals during elections.

Summary

House Bill 6846 aims to regulate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in generating deceptive synthetic media that can influence elections. The bill defines deceptive synthetic media as any image, audio, or video representation that misrepresents an individual's appearance or conduct, produced with AI or similar means, and establishes strict limitations on the distribution of such media in the lead-up to elections. This legislation intends to protect candidates from misleading media that may damage their reputation or affect election outcomes by prohibiting distribution of deceptive media without consent from the featured individual.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 6846 appears to be cautious optimism among supporters who view it as a necessary step to ensure election fairness and candidate protection. Proponents argue that with the rise of digital media manipulation, there is a heightened need for legal frameworks that safeguard electoral processes. However, concerns have been raised about the broader implications of regulating digital communications and the challenges associated with enforcing such restrictions without infringing on free speech rights. This debate highlights the tension between ensuring electoral integrity and preserving open communication.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential overreach of restrictions on media and the vagueness surrounding what constitutes deceptive media. Critics posit that the bill could inadvertently stifle legitimate use of media and manipulation in political discourse or public commentary. Furthermore, there is unease regarding the implications for independent media outlets and social platforms, which may face increased liability for content shared. This ongoing debate underscores the need for careful consideration in crafting effective regulations that balance election integrity with the rights of individuals and organizations to communicate freely.