Michigan House Bill HB4705

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/7/23
• Refer: 6/7/23
• Report Pass: 2/6/24
• Engrossed: 3/5/24
• Refer: 3/6/24

Caption

Highways: memorial; portion of M-150; designate as the "William S. Broomfield Memorial Highway". Amends 2001 PA 142 (MCL 250.1001 - 250.2092) by adding sec. 109.

Impact

The enactment of HB 4705 will have implications for the Michigan Memorial Highway Act, as it adds a new section that identifies a specific highway segment for memorial designation. This addition will enhance the awareness of local history and may encourage tourism or interest in the area. The bill signifies not only a tribute to an individual’s legacy but also demonstrates the state’s commitment to preserving and honoring local heritage through such memorials.

Summary

House Bill 4705 proposes the designation of a specific section of M-150 highway in Oakland County, Michigan, as the "William S. Broomfield Memorial Highway." This bill aims to honor the legacy of William S. Broomfield, a notable figure recognized for his contributions to the region and its community. By formalizing this designation, the bill reflects the state's intent to commemorate significant individuals and their impact on local history.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 4705 appears to be positive, with a strong consensus among lawmakers to support this designation. The bill was met with overwhelming approval during the voting process, indicating that the memorialization of William S. Broomfield resonates well with the legislative body and the constituents they represent. The strong majority of votes in favor suggests that this initiative is welcomed as a meaningful recognition of local history.

Contention

While no significant points of contention are noted regarding HB 4705, as memorial designations typically garner widespread acceptance, some concerns could have arisen around the allocation of resources for signage and upkeep. However, given the context and the supportive voting outcome—with 104 yeas to only 3 nays—these concerns did not impede the bill's progress or its acceptance in the legislature.