Kentucky Senate Bill SR38

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/23
• Refer: 1/6/23
• Passed: 1/6/23

Caption

A RESOLUTION condemning the January 6, 2021, United States Capitol riots.

Impact

The resolution carries significant implications as it publicly aligns the Commonwealth of Kentucky with a national stance against violent attempts to disrupt the democratic process. It serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance in protecting democratic institutions from both external and internal threats. By condemning the actions that transpired on that day, the Senate aims to promote dialogue on safeguarding democracy and reestablishing faith in electoral procedures. The resolution does not propose new laws but rather aims to invoke public consciousness around the events and their implications on future governance.

Summary

SR38 is a resolution that unequivocally condemns the January 6, 2021, riots at the United States Capitol, characterizing the events as a stark violation of democracy and a threat to the peaceful transfer of power. The resolution emphasizes the fundamental democratic principle that power must be transferred peacefully among elected officials, thereby reaffirming the state's commitment to uphold these values. By formally denouncing the insurrection, the resolution seeks to reinforce the principles of law and order and the importance of a functioning democracy, which includes ensuring that every citizen's voting rights are respected and protected.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR38 is largely positive among those who prioritize democratic integrity, emphasizing unity and commitment to democratic principles. The resolution aims to create a bipartisan acknowledgment of the threat posed by the events of January 6, promoting a sense of solidarity among legislators regardless of party affiliation. However, it may also elicit mixed reactions within certain political circles, where perspectives on the nature of the events and the responses to them may vary.

Contention

While the resolution seeks to unify, there is potential contention surrounding its implications and the political narratives it may engender. Supporters may argue that it reinforces the need for accountability and supports the integrity of democratic processes, while critics could perceive it as a means of political leverage. Further, discussions about policing and security around the events of that day remain sensitive topics, with varying viewpoints on the appropriateness of responses taken by law enforcement during the riots.