Wisconsin Senate Bill SB267

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/2/23
• Report Pass: 11/8/23
• Refer: 11/13/23
• Engrossed: 11/14/23
• Enrolled: 11/16/23
• Chaptered: 12/7/23
• Passed: 12/7/23

Caption

A grant program for recovery high schools and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

By instituting operational grants, SB267 impacts state education laws significantly by enabling recovery high schools to apply for direct funding from the Department of Public Instruction. This financial support is poised to enhance the infrastructure, staffing, and overall resources available for students in recovery. Moreover, the bill requires rigorous accountability measures, including the submission of independent financial audits and operation reports, ensuring that the funds are used effectively to support recovery-oriented educational models.

Summary

SB267 aims to create a comprehensive framework for the establishment and funding of recovery high schools in Wisconsin. These schools are designed specifically for students recovering from substance use and mental health disorders. The bill outlines eligibility criteria for both operational and planning grants intended to support new and existing recovery schools. It emphasizes the importance of academic achievement alongside recovery support services, advocating for a structured environment that encourages sobriety and personal growth among students.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB267 appears generally positive, particularly among advocates for mental health and addiction recovery. Supporters argue that this bill provides essential resources to help students who might otherwise struggle in traditional educational settings. However, some concerns have been voiced regarding the adequacy of funding and whether it will be sufficient to establish a robust network of recovery high schools throughout the state. Opponents express a need for more thorough discussions on oversight and the potential challenges these schools may face.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics around the funding amounts and the criteria for grant eligibility. Critics of SB267 argue that while the intentions are commendable, the actual mechanics of implementation, particularly in terms of funding allocation and school operation standards, need further clarification. There is also discussion about how effectively these recovery schools can support their students, particularly regarding the unique needs of youth navigating both educational and recovery challenges.