Maryland House Bill HB932

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/22
• Refer: 2/7/22
• Report Pass: 3/14/22
• Engrossed: 3/16/22
• Refer: 3/16/22
• Report Pass: 4/8/22
• Enrolled: 4/9/22
• Chaptered: 5/29/22

Caption

Landlord and Tenant – Right to Redemption of Leased Premises – Form of Payment

Impact

The bill amends existing Maryland laws related to landlord-tenant relationships, particularly Article Real Property, by explicitly permitting checks from political subdivisions as a valid form of payment for tenants wishing to redeem their leases. This change is significant as it could potentially reduce the number of evictions by providing tenants with more means to settle their overdue payments. The inclusion of electronic checks is also noteworthy, as it modernizes the payment options available under state law.

Summary

House Bill 932 focuses on the rights of tenants in Maryland, specifically addressing the right to redemption of leased premises in the event of a summary ejectment for non-payment of rent. The bill allows tenants to redeem their leased premises by making payments with checks issued by governmental entities, thus broadening the forms of acceptable payment. This legislative change aims to provide additional flexibility for tenants who are facing eviction due to failure to pay rent, allowing them a chance to resolve their debts before any eviction order is executed.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 932 appears to be positive among tenant advocacy groups who argue that it supports tenant rights and helps prevent unnecessary evictions. Proponents likely view this bill as a compassionate measure that allows struggling tenants one more opportunity to stay in their homes, thereby aligning with public health initiatives and housing stability concerns. However, landlords may express concerns that this could prolong the eviction process or complicate usual proceedings.

Contention

Despite the favorable view from tenant advocates, some stakeholders may find contention in the bill's implications for landlords and property owners. Critics could argue that the additional provisions for payment methods might lead to administrative burdens or delays in evictions, which could affect landlords' recovery of rents owed. Moreover, the clause specifying that tenants with three judgments against them in the past year cannot exercise this right may bring about discussions regarding fairness and the balance of power between tenants and landlords.