California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB436

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Refer
6/17/25  

Caption

Unlawful detainer: notice to terminate tenancy.

Impact

The enactment of SB 436 would substantially amend Sections of the Civil Code, thereby affecting tenant rights and landlord obligations in California. By extending the notice period before landlords can file an unlawful detainer complaint, the legislation seeks to offer an additional layer of protection for tenants, allowing them more time to respond to payment defaults without the looming threat of immediate eviction. This could lead to a reduction in the number of evictions filed during financial crises and promote stability for renters who might otherwise lose their housing with little recourse.

Summary

Senate Bill 436, introduced by Senator Wahab, aims to revise procedures surrounding unlawful detainer actions related to rental properties. This bill proposes extending the notice period landlords must give tenants in default on their rent payments from the current requirement of three days to fourteen days. Exemptions for weekends and judicial holidays remain, thus ensuring tenants have more time to remedy their payment issues before a landlord can initiate eviction proceedings. This change is particularly significant given the ongoing discussions about tenant protection amid rising rent prices and housing instability in California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 436 appears to be mixed. Supporters, primarily tenant advocacy groups and some lawmakers, view the bill as a necessary step towards protecting vulnerable renters from aggressive eviction practices, arguing that it provides essential breathing room for those facing temporary financial hardship. However, opponents, mainly from landlord associations and certain business groups, contend that the bill could encourage tenants to delay payments and complicate the eviction process, ultimately leading to longer disputes that strain landlords financially.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 436 include debates over the balance of power between landlords and tenants. Critics argue that the extended notice period may unintentionally burden landlords, who face challenges recouping lost rental income due to delayed evictions. Conversely, proponents emphasize the need for more equitable treatment of tenants, particularly in light of ongoing housing crises exacerbated by economic factors. The discussions on this bill highlight broader issues of housing policy in California, particularly regarding regulations that aim to protect the rights of renters while also ensuring that landlords can operate fairly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB567

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just causes: gross rental rate increases.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA AB2304

Unlawful detainer: case records.

CA SB395

Leases: notice of termination or rent increase: statewide database.

CA AB2216

Tenancy: common household pets.

CA AB2747

Tenancy: credit reporting.

CA AB2801

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB12

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2785

Tenancy: applications and security deposits.

CA SB1103

Tenancy of commercial real properties: agreements: building operating costs.

Similar Bills

CA AB2343

Real property: possession: unlawful detainer.

CA AB863

Residential rental properties: language requirements.

CA SB611

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

CA AB246

Social Security Tenant Protection Act of 2025.