Wisconsin Senate Bill SB286

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/23
• Refer: 5/15/23
• Report Pass: 1/11/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

The number of signatures on nomination papers.

Impact

If enacted, SB286 would alter existing procedures for evaluating nomination papers, promoting a more inclusive electoral process. By enabling a review of extra signatures to determine sufficiency for ballot access, the bill aims to reduce potential barriers for candidates, particularly those from less established backgrounds who may still gather substantial support from their communities. The implications extend not only to candidates but also to voters who may have an increased variety of choices on their ballots, thus enhancing democratic participation.

Summary

Senate Bill 286 proposes amendments to sections of the Wisconsin Statutes regarding the number of signatures required on nomination papers for candidates seeking state or local office. The bill allows election officials to review additional signatures submitted by candidates even if they exceed the maximum number required. This is particularly significant if the candidate's valid signatures fall short of the threshold necessary for their name to appear on the ballot. The underlying intent is to ensure that candidates who demonstrate considerable community support, by collecting more signatures than the minimum, are not excluded from the election process due to a technical limitation.

Contention

Points of contention may arise from differing perspectives on the need for such changes. Supporters argue that this bill enhances democratic participation by allowing more candidates to qualify for elections, reflecting the will of the voters more accurately. On the other hand, critics may raise concerns about the potential for mismanagement and increased workloads for election officials who must process more signatures than previously required. Moreover, there may be apprehensions surrounding the integrity of the signature collection process, questioning whether it may lead to irregularities in how candidates gather support.