The potential impact of SCR8405 on state laws is significant, particularly in how legislation is managed within the state legislature. The resolution could lead to a more organized legislative calendar, meaning that bills could be returned for additional debate or amendments if necessary. This might facilitate a better alignment of proposed laws with public interest and voter expectations, as lawmakers would have additional opportunities to revise and refine legislative proposals before they move forward.
Summary
SCR8405 is a concurrent resolution that focuses on the procedural aspect of legislative decision-making by allowing the return of bills to their house of origin. This resolution aims to streamline the legislative process and ensure that bills are reconsidered at their point of origin, encouraging further discussion and refinement. Supporters argue that granting this power to the legislative body will enhance efficiency in the law-making process, thereby allowing for more thoughtful consideration of legislation before final votes are taken.
Sentiment
Sentiment around SCR8405 appears generally positive among those who emphasize the need for a more efficient legislative process. Proponents believe that the ability to return bills to their origin will prevent rushed decisions and promote better governance. However, there may also be concerns related to the implications of returning bills, such as the potential for prolonged legislative sessions and the risk of political maneuvering, which could lead to delays in the passage of crucial legislation.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SCR8405 include the debate about the balance between efficiency and thoroughness in the legislative process. While proponents argue that the resolution is a necessary tool for improving legislative outcomes, opponents may worry about the potential for abuse of this process. Critics could raise concerns that returning bills to their house of origin might be used strategically to stall legislation, thereby affecting timely governance and the ability to respond quickly to pressing issues facing the state.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Providing gate money to incarcerated individuals at the department of corrections.Original: Providing gate money to individuals releasing from custody prior to the expiration of their sentence.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction and clarifying that a tax increment area must be dissolved when all bond obligations are paid.Original: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction.
Revised for 1st Substitute: Limiting a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.Original: Eliminating a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.