The implications of SCR8416 on state laws come primarily through its enhancement of the legislative procedure. By requiring bills to return to their house of origin, the resolution aims to prevent legislation from being passed without adequate scrutiny and debate. This change underscores the importance of civic engagement and highlights the role of legislators in reviewing and refining proposed laws. As a result, laws that may have significant local impacts will be given the attention they need during the legislative process.
Summary
SCR8416 is a concurrent resolution that mandates the return of certain bills to their house of origin within a specified timeframe. This resolution aims to streamline the legislative process by ensuring that all bills are debated and voted on in their originating chamber before further action is taken. This encourages more thorough consideration of legislation and holds lawmakers accountable for the bills they sponsor. The resolution reflects a commitment to a more efficient legislative process and greater transparency in decision-making.
Contention
Discussion around SCR8416 has noted both support and criticism from various legislative factions. Proponents view the resolution as a necessary reform that promotes legislative responsibility and ensures that bills receive proper consideration. In contrast, opponents argue that this requirement may lead to unnecessary delays and hinder the progress of important legislation that could address urgent issues. This tension reflects broader debates in the legislative community about balancing expediency with thoroughness in the lawmaking process.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Providing gate money to incarcerated individuals at the department of corrections.Original: Providing gate money to individuals releasing from custody prior to the expiration of their sentence.
Revised for 2nd Substitute: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction and clarifying that a tax increment area must be dissolved when all bond obligations are paid.Original: Creating an option for impacted taxing districts to provide a portion of their new revenue to support any tax increment area proposed within their jurisdiction.
Revised for 1st Substitute: Limiting a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.Original: Eliminating a business and occupation tax deduction for financial institutions to fund affordable housing.